Crash Data Journalism · Issue 17
Barred From Medicare, Not From Florida
Medicare keeps a public list of the providers it has thrown out and will not let back in. Florida has 846 of them - about 1.5 times the national rate per resident. A federal payment ban is not a state license ban, and the bills a crash victim ends up owing do not run through Medicare at all.
Before you read: this is data journalism from a public federal file, not an accusation against any individual. A Medicare revocation is an enrollment action by the federal payment program. It is not a criminal charge, and it is not a Florida license revocation. We report this in aggregate and name no one.
01The list almost nobody reads
Medicare publishes the name of every provider and supplier it has revoked and is refusing to re-enroll. It is one of the bluntest accountability documents in American health care, and it is free to download.
When the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services revokes a provider, that provider stops being able to bill Medicare - and CMS attaches a re-enrollment bar, a fixed number of years before they may even apply to come back. CMS publishes the currently barred list: name, NPI, provider type, the legal ground for the revocation, the date it took effect, and the date the bar expires.
Florida holds 10.4% of every barred provider in the country while housing about 6.8% of its people. Only three states have a higher rate per resident, and two of them - Vermont and West Virginia - are small enough that a few dozen cases move the number. Among the ten largest states, Florida ranks second.
02Florida's rate, in context
Raw counts follow population. Rates do not. Measured per resident, Florida sits well above the national average and above every large state except Michigan.
Barred Medicare providers per million residents. Florida runs about 1.5 times the national rate; among the ten largest states, only Michigan is higher.
Florida is home to 6.8% of Americans and 10.4% of every medical provider Medicare currently refuses to do business with.
03What they were barred for
The file gives the legal ground for each revocation. A provider can be cited on several at once, and the mix matters: some grounds are paperwork, and some are not.
| Ground | Providers | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Failure to report a change - (a)(9) | 459 | 54.3% |
| Felony conviction - (a)(3) | 317 | 37.5% |
| On-site review: not operational - (a)(5) | 280 | 33.1% |
| Provider conduct / federal exclusion - (a)(2) | 162 | 19.1% |
| Noncompliance with enrollment rules - (a)(1) | 121 | 14.3% |
| False or misleading information - (a)(4) | 59 | 7.0% |
| Abuse of billing privileges - (a)(8) | 38 | 4.5% |
Grounds cited for Florida's 846 barred providers, under 42 CFR 424.535(a). Shares exceed 100% because a single revocation can cite multiple grounds.
The most-cited ground, failing to report a change, is administrative on its own - a moved office, a new owner, an unreported ownership stake. It is rarely the whole story, though: it appears most often stacked alongside something heavier. The two grounds that carry real weight are the felony citation, which appears for 317 Florida providers, and the on-site review, which appears for 280.
An on-site review failure means an inspector went to the address on the enrollment file and did not find a functioning practice there. Two hundred and eighty Florida providers were barred at least partly on that finding.
04Half are barred for a decade
The length of the re-enrollment bar is CMS's own severity scale. Florida's list skews toward the top of it.
CMS scales the bar to what it found: one to three years for lesser violations, up to ten for the serious ones, and longer still in rare cases - the longest bar on Florida's list runs more than 23 years. Nearly half of Florida's barred providers sit at ten years or more, the range CMS reserves for conduct it treats as a lasting risk to the program.
05The part that matters after a crash
A Medicare revocation closes exactly one door: billing Medicare. It does not close the doors a crash victim is actually pushed through.
Almost nothing about a Florida crash claim runs through Medicare. The first $10,000 of care runs through Personal Injury Protection, billed to an auto insurer. After PIP is exhausted, the common arrangement is a letter of protection: a clinic treats you now and takes payment later, out of your settlement, secured by a lien. None of that is Medicare, and none of it is watched the way Medicare watches itself.
That distinction is not theoretical, and we can measure one edge of it. We checked all 846 barred Florida providers against the 1,660 Florida orthopedic providers who actively bill Medicare. The overlap is zero - as it must be, because a barred provider cannot bill Medicare at all. Revocation does not make a provider visible in the data. It makes them invisible to it.
Revocation removes a provider from the one payment system that publishes its own enforcement. It does not remove them from the payment systems a crash victim actually uses.
- 38% of Florida's barred providers - 321 of 846 - fall in provider types a crash victim plausibly encounters: 270 clinic or group practices, plus chiropractic, physical therapy, diagnostic radiology, independent diagnostic testing facilities, pain management, physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology and orthopedic surgery.
- 603 of the 846 are organizations - clinics, groups and supply companies - rather than individual practitioners. Organizations can be restructured and renamed in ways an individual license cannot.
- A Medicare bar is federal and payment-specific. Florida licensure is separate, handled by the Florida Department of Health, and a provider can hold a valid, unrestricted Florida license while barred from Medicare.
06What this data cannot tell you
This file is precise about one thing and silent about several others. The silences matter more than usual here, so we are explicit about them.
- It cannot show a trend. The file contains only providers whose bar is currently active, so older revocations drop off as their bars expire. That creates a survivorship illusion: revocations from 2019 that remain on the list carry a median 10-year bar, while 2025's carry a median of 3.2 years. The apparent rise in recent years is the filter, not enforcement. We make no claim about whether revocations are rising or falling.
- It has no geography below the state. The file records a state code and nothing finer, so we cannot say which Florida cities or counties these providers operated in.
- It does not mean any provider on it is currently treating crash victims. We found no evidence of that for any individual and make no such claim. This is a story about a structural gap, not about named people.
- Revocation is not conviction. More than half the Florida entries cite a reporting failure, which on its own is administrative. We report the grounds as CMS records them and let the mix speak.
- The list is public, and we deliberately do not republish names here. Anyone can look up a specific provider, and we built a free tool that searches both federal lists by name or NPI so you do not have to parse a federal file yourself.
07What a patient can actually do
None of this means Florida care is unsafe. It means the paperwork that protects you across most of medicine is thinner in the corner of it that crash victims get routed into.
- Ask who is treating you, and write down the practice's full legal name and the treating provider's name - not just the clinic's marketing name.
- Be cautious when a clinic is introduced to you by someone who is not a doctor - a caller, a body shop, a tow operator, a person at the scene.
- Understand what you are signing. A letter of protection is a lien on your settlement, not a favor, and it attaches at the billed rate.
- Prefer providers with a verifiable, active federal billing record. Our provider finder ranks Florida orthopedic providers on Medicare quality data, which by construction contains only providers in good standing with the program.
- You are allowed to change providers. Nothing about PIP requires you to stay with the first clinic you were sent to.
The honest summary is narrow: 846 Florida providers are barred from the federal payment program, nearly half of them for a decade or more, and the part of Florida medicine that treats crash victims is not the part that bar governs.
Put this to work on your own case
Free, private tools that track your Florida deadlines, estimate what you'd actually keep after fees, and draft your claim — no account, nothing leaves your phone.
Common questions
How many Florida medical providers are barred from Medicare?
846 Florida providers and suppliers are currently revoked from Medicare and under an active re-enrollment bar, according to the public CMS file. That is 10.4% of the 8,136 barred nationwide, in a state with about 6.8% of the U.S. population.
Does being barred from Medicare mean a provider lost their Florida license?
No. A Medicare revocation is a federal enrollment action that stops a provider from billing Medicare. Florida medical licensure is separate and handled by the Florida Department of Health. A provider can hold a valid Florida license while barred from Medicare.
Why does a Medicare ban matter for a car accident claim?
Because almost none of a Florida crash claim runs through Medicare. The first $10,000 goes through PIP, and care after that is often provided under a letter of protection paid out of your settlement. A federal payment ban does not reach those arrangements, so the enforcement that removes a provider from Medicare does not remove them from crash-injury work.
What were Florida providers most often barred for?
The most-cited ground is failure to report a change (459 providers, 54.3%), which is administrative on its own and usually appears alongside something heavier. Felony conviction was cited for 317 providers (37.5%), and an on-site review finding the practice not operational was cited for 280 (33.1%).
Can I check whether a specific provider is on the list?
Yes. CMS publishes the file publicly and it is searchable by name and NPI. We report this data in aggregate and do not republish names, but any patient can look up a specific provider in the CMS source linked in our sources.
More investigations
- Which Car Insurers Do Florida Crash Victims Sue Most?We matched every insurance company named in a year of Tampa Bay crash lawsuits -- across Hillsborough and Pinellas, the two Florida counties that publish open bulk civil-court data -- against how many Florida drivers each one actually insures. The company sued most often is not the one injured people sue most often, and once you adjust for size, one big carrier generates far more genuine injury lawsuits per customer than its rivals. Two counties, examined separately, land on the same finding.Nearly Half of the Florida Children Killed in Crashes Weren't Buckled InWe looked at five years of Florida's fatal crashes. Of the children who died riding in a car, 43% had no restraint at all — no seat belt, no car seat, nothing. And the older the child, the more likely they were unprotected — right at the age Florida's law stops requiring a car seat.Less Than 1% of Florida Crash Lawsuits Reach a Jury — and Winning Isn't Getting PaidWe analyzed thousands of closed auto-injury cases and post-judgment records from Hillsborough and Pinellas — the two Florida counties that publish open bulk civil-court data, together the Tampa Bay core. Almost none go to trial. The settlement amount is never in the file. And even the people who win a judgment often have to send the sheriff after the money.
Related guides
Methodology. We downloaded the complete CMS Revoked Medicare Providers and Suppliers file (8,136 records nationwide) through the data.cms.gov API and filtered to the 846 records carrying a Florida state code. Each record includes an NPI, provider type, one or more revocation grounds under 42 CFR 424.535(a), a revocation effective date and a re-enrollment bar expiration date. We parsed the multi-ground reason strings into individual statutory grounds, so shares sum to more than 100%. Per-capita rates use 2024 Census state population estimates, and we ranked only states with at least 25 barred providers to avoid small-number noise. Bar length is the difference between the revocation effective date and the bar expiration date. We tested the year distribution for survivorship bias by comparing median bar length by revocation year, found it severe (10.0 years for 2019-2022 versus 3.2 years for 2025), and therefore report no time trend. To test overlap with active practice, we cross-referenced all 846 NPIs against 1,660 Florida orthopedic providers drawn from Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners data; the overlap was zero, the expected result given that a revoked provider cannot bill Medicare.
This is data journalism and general information, not legal advice. Figures describe aggregate public-record patterns, not any individual case or outcome.